Good for Fox. The amount of time the PResident seems to be on prime-time network TV is getting ridiculous. The President should only be on a few times a year if only so people realize it’s important. Being on monthly is little more than an ego stroke.
I really dislike the cable companies. It really appears that they go out of there way to screw people. This was a short little explanation of the bandwidth “crisis” we are experiencing. The main takeaways I got were that using more bandwidth does not cost the cable company more money and that the new faster equipment actually costs the cable LESS even though they want to charge more for it. Shameless.
Oh my. Don’t get me wrong I’m a mac guy. If you ask me about computers, i’ll spend a half hour convincing you to get a mac and have 100 reasons why. However, this CNBC video is at it’s core nearly entirely untrue. These aren’t half truths or marketing speaks, The things Jim Goldman says are out and out LIES. I would think that Apple paid CNBC for this spot, but I don’t think they would be want to be responsible for the preposterous statements he makes.
I believe the total cost of ownership on a mac is much closer than the original purchase price makes it appear. I believe most home users would be much happier on a mac and that overall they do just work better. But… they do NOT come with photoshop. They do NOT need $100 music software, they come with iTunes which is FREE and also on PC’s. They have the same processors available in PC’s and you can get the same screen resolution.
This video was sloppy journalism by CNBC who are quickly establishing themselves as a worthless place for anything resembling honest news. They should be ashamed.
once you’re on the twitter, feel free to follow @coreyehlert
this guy is clearly a genius. good work there buddy.
Congratulations Frank. It’s a PC.
this makes me want to move to Texas.
I can’t embed this, but damn, easily the most surprising performance i’ve ever seen on a show like this. just totally shocking…wow.
yes, perfect. Why wouldn’t we cite foreign law in US Constitutional cases? Makes perfect sense to me. WAIT….NO, NO IT DOESN’T!!! We should only cite US law on US cases. Seems pretty obvious to me.
“Marge, don’t discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It’s what separates us from the animals…except the weasel.” — Homer Simpson
